Evaluation of High-Tech Projects Failure Factors in Afghanistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v5i1.3318Keywords:
High-Tech Projects, ICT, e-Services, Infrastructure, ManagementAbstract
Afghanistan ranks among the unfortunate low-income countries lacking viable and consistent electronic government systems, policies, and infrastructure for project execution. Despite the country's adoption of technology, digital systems and ICT projects remain inefficient and prone to vulnerabilities, hindering the delivery of reliable services to both the Afghan government and its citizens. This research assesses various technology-based projects to uncover the underlying causes of failures. The study’s main goals include pinpointing these root causes, exploring the link between policies and ICT initiatives, evaluating platforms and services, and offering recommendations to enhance the environment for the effective and timely execution of ICT projects. A focus on user-centered design is maintained throughout the research process, which employs a mixed-methods approach. This study provides valuable insights for both private and public sectors to implement projects more effectively. We aim for this research to shed light on the factors leading to failures during the planning, design, and implementation phases of projects, encouraging a reflective approach moving forward.
Downloads
References
Abu-Shanab, E., & Bataineh, L. Q. (2015). Challenges Facing E-government Projects: How to Avoid Failure? International Journal of Emerging Sciences (pp. 207-217). IJES.
Ahmadzai, N., & McKinnon, R. (2021). "Strategy, Policy, and Legal Barriers to E-Government Implementation in Afghanistan." International Journal of Public Administration, 44(10), 801–811.
Damoah, I. S. (2015). "An Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Project Failure in Government Projects in Developing Countries: Ghana as a Case Study." PhD Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University
Heeks, R. (2015). "Corruption as a Source of E-Government Project Failure in Developing Countries: A Theoretical Assessment." International Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 105–112.
John W. Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Khan, S., & Krishnan, S. (2019). "E-Government Project Failures in Developing Countries: An Analysis through Actor-Network Theory." Information Systems Frontiers, 21(4), 887–906
Khan, S., & Krishnan, S. (2019). "E-Government Project Failures in Developing Countries: An Analysis through Actor-Network Theory." Information Systems Frontiers, 21(4), 887–906.
Nations, U. (2022). UN E-Government Survey 2022. New York: UN.
Nohzatullah Ahmadzai, e. (2015). AN EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION OF PROJECTS FAILURE IN.
Proceedings of The IRES 30th International Conference (pp. 18-23). Tokyo: IRES.
Sumitani, T. (2012). "Tankyu (Inquiry) Practice. In A new practical method of problem solving. Japan: PHP Institute.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Hanif Gharanai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
- Authors retain full copyright of their work
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
- This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.