Journal Thumbnail

Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi)

E-ISSN: 2580-1643 | P-ISSN:

Ignatius Christ Surya (1) , Rahmat Mulyana (2) , Ryan Adhitya Nugraha (3)

(1) Ignatius Christ Surya:

Information Systems Study Program, Universitas Telkom, Bandung City, West Java Province, Indonesia

(2) Rahmat Mulyana:

Department of Computer and Systems Science, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 54, Frescati, Stockholm, Sweden

(3) Ryan Adhitya Nugraha:

Department of Computer and Systems Science, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 54, Frescati, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract:

In the digital era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, organizations such as BPRDCo must undergo Digital Transformation (DT) to remain competitive. A significant obstacle in this process is often the inadequacy of information security controls, which can lead to DT failure. Previous research has highlighted the necessity of ambidextrous information security management—integrating both traditional and agile approaches—as a crucial mechanism for DT success in large banks, particularly in data management and information security. However, this strategy has not been proven effective for smaller banks like BPRDCo. Therefore, this study aims to develop and propose priority information security management solutions specifically tailored for SMEs, while also estimating the improvement in maturity level capabilities to boost DT success. The research follows five stages in Design Science Research (DSR): problem identification, requirements specification, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation. Data were collected through interviews and document analysis, and analyzed using the ISO 27001:2022 Information Security Management System (ISMS) framework. Six priority PDCA and Annex controls were identified for BPRDCo as the case study. Based on the identified gaps, six essential solutions were designed using ISMS controls. These recommendations were compiled into an implementation roadmap to enhance BPRDCo's readiness for full ISMS implementation and certification, ultimately supporting DT success in small banks.


Statistic:
Total Downloads Artikel Last 1 Year
Download data is not yet available.
Shared With:

Article Details

How to Cite
Surya, I. C., Rahmat Mulyana, & Nugraha, R. A. (2024). BPRDCo SME Digital Transformation by Designing Information Security Using ISO 27001:2022. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 8(4), 1242–1253. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v8i4.3148
Author Biographies

Ignatius Christ Surya, Universitas Telkom

Information Systems Study Program, Universitas Telkom, Bandung City, West Java Province, Indonesia

Rahmat Mulyana, Stockholm University

Department of Computer and Systems Science, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 54, Frescati, Stockholm, Sweden

Ryan Adhitya Nugraha, Stockholm University

Department of Computer and Systems Science, Stockholm University, Frescativägen 54, Frescati, Stockholm, Sweden

References
Schwertner, K. (2017). Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Science, 15(Suppl. 1), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.065

Hadiono, K., Candra, R., & Santi, N. (2020). Menyongsong Transformasi Digital.

Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217

Viamianni, A., Mulyana, R., & Dewi, F. (2023). COBIT 2019 information security focus area implementation for Reinsurco digital transformation. JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33387/jiko.v6i2.6366

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2022). IT governance mechanisms that influence digital transformation: A Delphi study in Indonesian banking and insurance industry. PACIS 2022 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2022

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2021). IT governance mechanisms influence on digital transformation: A systematic literature review. AMCIS 2021 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2021

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2023). How hybrid IT governance mechanismsinfluence digital transformation and organizational performance in the banking and insurance industry of Indonesia.

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2022). How hybrid IT governance mechanisms influence digital transformation and organizational performance in the banking and insurance industry of Indonesia.

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2024). Key ambidextrous IT governance mechanisms for successful digital transformation: A case study of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI). Digital Business, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100083

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2024). The influence of key ambidextrous IT governance mechanisms on digital transformation and organizational performance in the Indonesian banking and insurance industry. PACIS 2024 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2024

Tarbiyatuzzahrah, B. D., Mulyana, R., & Santoso, A. F. (2023). Penggunaan COBIT 2019 GMO dalam menyusun pengelolaan layanan TI prioritas pada transformasi digital BankCo. JTIM: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, 5(3), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.35746/jtim.v5i3.400

Dwi, Y. W., Dewi, M., Mulyana, R., & Santoso, A. F. (2023). Penggunaan COBIT 2019 I&T risk management untuk pengelolaan risiko transformasi digital BankCo.

Rahmadana, A., Mulyana, R., & Santoso, A. F. (2023). Pemanfaatan COBIT 2019 information security dalam merancang manajemen keamanan informasi pada transformasi BankCo.

Riznawati, N., Mulyana, R., & Santoso, A. F. (2023). Pendayagunaan COBIT 2019 DevOps dalam merancang manajemen pengembangan TI Agile pada transformasi digital BankCo. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 2023–223.

Anugerah, M. R. A. W. (2023). Manajemen keamanan informasi untuk transformasi digital Insurco berbasis COBIT 2019 focus area information security.

Prayudi, R. A., Mulyana, R., & Fauzi, R. (2023). Pengendalian digitalisasi FintechCo melalui perancangan pengelolaan keamanan informasi berbasis COBIT 2019 information security focus area. SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 388–406.

POJK 7. (2024). POJK 7 Tahun 2024 Bank Perekonomian Rakyat dan Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah.

POJK 20. (2014). POJK 20. Bank Perkeditan Rakyat.

Shabri, H., et al. (2020). Transformasi digital industri perbankan syariah Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 3(2).

POJK75. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (PP Nomor 75 Tahun 2016).

Haikal, H., Ananza, R. H., Darmawan, I., & Mulyana, R. (2019). Perancangan tata kelola keamanan informasi sistem pemerintahan berbasis elektronik (SPBE) menggunakan standar ISO 27001:2013 (studi kasus: Diskominfotik Kabupaten Bandung Barat).

Panjaitan, B., Abdurrahman, L., & Mulyana, R. (2021). Pengembangan implementasi sistem manajemen keamanan informasi berbasis ISO 27001:2013 menggunakan kontrol Annex: Studi kasus data center PT. XYZ.

SEOJK15. (2017). SAL SEOJK 15 - SPTI BPR BPRS_240115_203306.

Moeti. (2022). Information security framework adoption for South African SME.

Nistotskaya, M., Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2014). The wealth of regions: quality of government and SMEs in 172 European regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 0(0), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1068/c13224r

ISO 27001. (2022). Information security, cybersecurity, and privacy protection-Information security management systems-Requirements.

Obuh, D. (2023). The structure of the ISMS documentation in accordance with updates to ISO 27001:2022, 27002:2022.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research.

Patricia, I., Ph. D., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Walden Faculty and Staff Publications. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/facpubs/455

ISO 2018. (2018). Information technology-Security techniques-Information security risk management.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.