Published: 2026-03-26
Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap in Organic Food Consumption: An Integrative Systematic Review of Emotion, Green Altruism, and Psychological Distance
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i1.6677
Downloads
Abstract
Organic food consumption has grown alongside increasing consumer concern for health, environmental sustainability, and ethical responsibility. Yet favorable attitudes do not consistently translate into actual purchasing behavior, indicating that the intention–behavior gap in this domain cannot be explained by rational evaluations alone. This study conducts a systematic literature review to develop an integrative psychological explanation of how emotion, green altruism, and psychological distance shape organic food consumption. Following PRISMA 2020, the review analyzed 35 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect and published between 2015 and 2025. The findings show that emotional mechanisms, particularly anticipated pride, guilt, and emotional attachment, commonly strengthen purchase intention by increasing perceived personal relevance, moral meaning, and self-consistency. Green altruism supports organic food consumption by framing it as an environmentally and socially responsible act, although its influence varies across contexts, consumer segments, and product categories. The reviewed evidence further indicates that psychological distance functions mainly as a framing and moderating mechanism that shapes whether emotional and altruistic motives are perceived as immediate, concrete, and behaviorally actionable. Across the reviewed studies, emotional and moral mechanisms more consistently predict intention than repeated purchase behavior, while trust, norms, and message framing help explain empirical inconsistencies. Overall, this review advances an integrative framework for explaining organic food consumption beyond rational choice and provides directions for future research on sustainable consumption behavior.
Keywords
Emotion ; Green altruism ; Organic food ; Psychological distance ; Sustainable consumption
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: %750 %e, %2026
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2026 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijmsit.v6i1.6677
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
Ari Apriani
Doctoral Study Program in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, West Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Setyo Riyanto
Doctoral Study Program in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, West Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Rina Astini
Doctoral Study Program in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, West Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Mas Wahyu Wibowo
Doctoral Study Program in Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mercu Buana, West Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
-
Ali, F., Ashfaq, M., Begum, S., & Ali, A. (2020). How “Green” thinking and altruism translate into purchasing intentions for electronics products: The intrinsic-extrinsic motivation mechanism. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 281–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.013
-
Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Zielke, S. (2017). Can’t buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), 211–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12092
-
Ayyub, S., Asif, M., & Nawaz, M. A. (2021). Drivers of Organic Food Purchase Intention in a Developing Country: The Mediating Role of Trust. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211045076. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211045076
-
Bazhan, M., Shafiei, F., & Nasrin, S. (2024). Factors affecting purchase intention of organic food products: Evidence from a developing nation context. Food Science & Nutrition, 12(5), 3023–3783. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4015
-
Bouwman, E. P., Galama, J., & Onwezen, M. C. (2024). Unravelling consumer acceptance of local food: Physical versus social distance and the important role of social identification. Appetite, 198(March), 107331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107331
-
Chang, H., Zhang, L., & Lee, J.-S. (2019). Not all organic food is created equal: The role of product type, perceived authenticity, and construal level. Journal of Marketing Communications, 25(8), 820–842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1468350
-
Chang, H., Zhang, L., & Xie, G.-X. (2015). Message framing in green advertising: The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 158–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.994731
-
Chao, C.-M., & Yu, T.-K. (2024). How emotions and green altruism explain consumer purchase intention toward circular economy products: A multi-group analysis on willingness to be environmentally friendly. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 2803–2816. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3632
-
Cheung, M. F. Y., To, W. M., Administration, B., Kong, H., Yan, S., & Sar, H. K. (2019). An extended model of value-attitude-behavior to explain Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50(April), 145–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.006
-
Curvelo, I. C. G., Watanabe, E. A. de M., & Alfinito, S. (2019). Purchase intention of organic food under the influence of attributes, consumer trust and perceived value. Revista de Gestão, 26(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0010
-
Duong, C., Sung, B., Lee, S., & Easton, J. (2024). The effect of shopping channel (online vs. offline) on message framing of naturalness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2259
-
ElHaffar, G., Durif, F., & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behavior gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556.
-
Engel, L., Vilhelmsen, K., Richte, I., Moritz, J., Ryynanen, T., Young, J. F., Burton, R. J. F., U. Kidmose, & Klockner, C. A. (2024). Psychological factors influencing consumer intentions to consume cultured meat, fish and dairy. Appetite, 200(May), 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107501
-
Guiao, B. G. M., & Lacap, J. P. G. (2022). Effects of Environmental Sustainability Awareness and Altruism on Green Purchase Intention and Brand Evangelism. Asian Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.220134
-
Haj-Salem, N., Ishaq, M. I., & Raza, A. (2022). How anticipated pride and guilt influence green consumption in the Middle East: The moderating role of environmental consciousness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103062.
-
Ismael, D., & Ploeger, A. (2020). Consumers’ Emotion Attitudes towards Organic and Conventional Food: A Comparison Study of Emotional Profiling and Self-Reported Method. Foods, 9(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010079
-
Jager, A.-K., & Weber, A. (2020). Can you believe it? The effects of benefit type versus construal level on advertisement credibility and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, 120543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120543
-
Kamboj, K. (2023). Influence of Customer Perceived Values on Organic Food Consumption Behaviour: Mediating Role of Green Purchase Intention. January. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221125283
-
Khan, K., Iqbal, S., Riaz, K., & Hameed, I. (2022). Organic food adoption motivations for sustainable consumption: moderating role of knowledge and perceived price. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2143015. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2143015
-
Konuk, F. A. (2021). Feeling guilty and willingness to buy organic food: the moderating role of motherhood. Baltic Journal of Management, 16(5), 699–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-12-2020-0465
-
Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., Sagar, M., & Gupta, B. (2019). Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers. Appetite, 143, 104402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104402
-
Leyva-hernández, S. N., Toledo-lópez, A., Hernández-lara, A. B., Arango-ramírez, P. M., Avendaño-rito, M. C., Tanakinjal, G. H., & Hernández-lara, A. B. (2025). Values, attitude, and desire in organic food purchase intention in Mexico. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8(January), 1516788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1516788
-
Li, J. Y., Wen, T. J., McKeever, R., & Kim, J. K. (2021). Uncertainty and Negative Emotions in Parental Decision-making on Childhood Vaccinations: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to the Context of Conflicting Health Information. Journal of Health Communication, 26(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1913677
-
Liang, S., Qin, L., Zhang, M., Chu, Y., Teng, L., & He, L. (2022). Win Big with Small: The Influence of Organic Food Packaging Size on Purchase Intention. Foods, 11(16), 2494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162494
-
Loebnitz, N., Frank, P., & Otterbring, T. (2022). Stairway to organic heaven: The impact of social and temporal distance in print ads. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1044–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.020
-
Lombardi, A., Califano, G., Caracciolo, F., Del Giudice, T., & Cembalo, L. (2024). Eco-packaging in organic foods: rational decisions or emotional influences? Organic Agriculture, 14(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00442-5
-
Nguyen, P., Nguyen, D. N., Anh, L., & Nguyen, T. (2023). Quantitative insights into green purchase intentions: The interplay of health consciousness, altruism, and sustainability. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2253616
-
Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
-
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: what do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
-
Pompili, S., Scaglioni, G., Guidetti, M., Festa, S., Azzena, I., Lenzi, M., Carraro, L., Conner, M., & Carfora, V. (2025). Does Anticipated Pride for Goal Achievement or Anticipated Guilt for Goal Failure Influence Meat Reduction? Sustainability, 17(16), 7231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167231
-
Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38(June), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004
-
Rūtelionė, A., & Bhutto, M. Y. (2024). Eco-conscious appetites: Investigating organic food purchase intentions through consumption values, empowered by environmental self-identity and analyzed using MGA – Baltic insights. Heliyon, 10(15), e35330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35330
-
Saleki, R., Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2019). What drives Malaysian consumers’ organic food purchase intention? The role of moral norm, self-identity, environmental concern and price consciousness. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 9(5), 584–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-02-2019-0018
-
Septianto, F., Kemper, J., & Paramita, W. (2019). The role of imagery in promoting organic food. Journal of Business Research, 101, 104–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.016
-
Shabnam, S., Quaddus, M., Roy, S. K., & Quazi, A. (2021). Consumer belief system and pro-environmental purchase intention: Does psychological distance intervene? Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, 129403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129403
-
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
-
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The Psychological Distance of Climate Change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
-
Sun, P., Li, L., Hossain, M. S., & Law, K. A. (2025). Eco-Conscious Preferences, Emotional Attributes, and Polarity in Sentiment Analysis of Organic Food App Reviews: A Feature Engineering and Deep Learning Approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour an International Research Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70026
-
Tang, D., Chen, J., Jiang, Q., Huang, H., & Zheng, M. (2025). How feeling loved inspires the purchase of green foods. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 102, 102523. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102523
-
Tang, D., Zheng, M., Chen, W., & Huang, H. (2025). Do consumers prefer nearby ugly food? Examining the role of spatial-social distance in suboptimal produce preference. Food Quality and Preference, 129, 105516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105516
-
Tian, H., Siddik, A. B., & Masukujjaman, M. (2022). Factors Affecting the Repurchase Intention of Organic Tea among Millennial Consumers: An Empirical Study. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020050
-
Tiwari, A. V., Bajpai, N., & Pandey, P. K. (2024). Understanding the influence of meaningfulness on memorable tourism experience (MTE) to invoke revisit intention in tourists with moderating effect of the perceived risk of COVID-19. Leisure/Loisir, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2024.2399603
-
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14: 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
-
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
-
Wang, C., Guo, J., Huang, W., Tang, Y., & Man, R. Y. (2024). Health-driven mechanism of organic food consumption: A structural equation modelling approach. Heliyon, 10(5), e27144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27144
-
Wang, X., Pacho, F., Liu, J., & Kajungiro, R. (2019). Factors Influencing Organic Food Purchase Intention in Developing Countries and the Moderating Role of Knowledge. Sustainability, 11(1), 209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010209
-
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
-
Willer, H., Schlatter, B., & Trávníček, J. (2023). The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends 2023. https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1254-organic-world-2023.pdf
-
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
-
Yuan, Y., Nguyen, M., Zhang, Y., & Cheah, I. (2025). The roles of psychological distance and digital blockchain technology in mitigating consumer reluctance toward alternative proteins. Appetite, 211, 108008. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108008
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.