Published: 2025-10-01
Trends and Directions of Gamification Research in Mathematics: Systematic Literature Review
DOI: 10.35870/jtik.v9i4.4301
I Ketut Lokasanti, Ketut Agustini, I Gde Wawan Sudatha, Anak Agung Adi Wiryya Putra
- I Ketut Lokasanti: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha , Indonesia
- Ketut Agustini: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha , Indonesia
- I Gde Wawan Sudatha: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha , Indonesia
- Anak Agung Adi Wiryya Putra: Universitas Pendidikan Nasional , Indonesia
Downloads
Article Metrics
- Views 59
- Downloads 350
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
Mathematics education plays a crucial role in equipping students with the skills necessary for the 21st century, such as critical thinking and problem-solving abilities. However, many students perceive mathematics as a challenging and tedious subject, which ultimately leads to a decline in their motivation and learning outcomes. Consequently, the application of gamification as an alternative method in mathematics instruction has demonstrated significant potential for enhancing student engagement and learning results. This research aims to investigate the impact of gamification in mathematics learning, as well as the trends associated with its implementation. Findings from prior studies indicate that gamification, whether digital or non-digital, can enhance motivation, reduce mathematics-related anxiety, and deepen the understanding of mathematical concepts. Digital educational games, along with the use of non-digital playing cards, have proven effective in improving student engagement and comprehension of mathematics across various educational levels. Adaptive learning systems that utilize artificial intelligence (AI) also exhibit substantial potential in providing personalized learning experiences tailored to the abilities of individual learners. This article examines 13 prominent journals selected following a rigorous elimination process utilizing the systematic literature review methodology. This process will occur from 2015 until 2025. The objective of this systematic approach is to evaluate and analyze pertinent, high-quality literature to enhance comprehension of the subject matter. The PRISMA approach is utilized to choose articles based on the established inclusion and exclusion criteria to get pertinent literature. Nevertheless, the challenges faced include the creation of gamification that is both more immersive and relevant to real-life contexts. Further research is required to explore the implementation of more pertinent gamification elements, such as challenges based on real-world situations and aspects of robotics, as well as the influence of social and emotional factors on the effectiveness of gamification in mathematics education. Thus, this study contributes to identifying the potential and shortcomings in the application of gamification within the field of mathematics education.
Keywords
Gamification ; Math ; Mathematics ; Game-Based Learning
Article Metadata
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page to understand its reach and credibility.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges by sharing data, materials, or preregistered studies.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026)
-
Section: Computer & Communication Science
-
Published: %750 %e, %2025
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2025 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jtik.v9i4.4301
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
-
Almo, A., Rocha, M., Brennan, A., & Dondio, P. (2024). Exploring the impact of player traits on the leaderboard experience in a digital maths game. International Journal of Serious Games, 11(4), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v11i4.794.
-
Celis, M. G., Fajardo, S. Y., Sambuceti, G. V., & Barros, R. (2023). Higher education students’ attitude towards using gamification and its relation with achievement. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education and Research (ICALTER 2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER61411.2023.10372929.
-
Christopoulos, A., Mystakidis, S., Kurczaba, J., Laakso, M. J., & Stylios, C. (2024). Is immersion in 3D virtual games associated with mathematical ability improvement in game-based learning? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(7), 1479–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10440-4.
-
Dan, N. N., Trung, L. T. B. T., Nga, N. T., & Dung, T. M. (2024). Digital game-based learning in mathematics education at primary school level: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14377.
-
Firdaus, M., & Mukhtar. (2020). Critical thinking skills of mathematics prospective teachers: An exploration study at Medan State University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/.012005.
-
Fuchs, K. (2022). Bringing Kahoot! into the classroom: The perceived usefulness and perceived engagement of gamified learning in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.7.1662
-
Fundoni, M., Porcu, L., & Melis, G. (2023). Systematic literature review: Main procedures and guidelines for interpreting the results. In Researching and analysing business: Research methods in practice. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003107774-5.
-
Garcia-Iruela, M., Fonseca, M. J., Hijon-Neira, R., & Chambel, T. (2020). Gamification and computer science students’ activity. IEEE Access, 8, 96829–96836. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997038.
-
Greipl, S., Moeller, K., Kiili, K., & Ninaus, M. (2020). Different performance, full experience: A learning game applied throughout adulthood. International Journal of Serious Games, 7(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v7i3.359.
-
Gurjanow, I., Oliveira, M., Zender, J., Santos, P. A., & Ludwig, M. (2019). Mathematics trails: Shallow and deep gamification. International Journal of Serious Games, 6(3), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i3.306.
-
Hilario, L., Mora, M. C., Montés, N., Romero, P. D., & Barquero, S. (2022). Gamification for maths and physics in university degrees through a transportation challenge. Mathematics, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214112.
-
Jawad, L. F. (2022). Mathematical connection skills and their relationship with productive thinking among secondary school students. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 10(1), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2667.
-
Lee, J. Y., Pyon, C. U., & Woo, J. (2023). Digital twin for math education: A study on the utilization of games and gamification for university mathematics education. Electronics, 12(15), 3207. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12153207
-
Li, M., Ma, S., & Shi, Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of gamification as a tool promoting teaching and learning in educational settings: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1253549.
-
Li, X., Yang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). How does gamification bring long-term sustainable effects on children’s learning? Implications from a crossover quasi-experimental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1357–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10341-x.
-
McMullen, J., Bui, P., Brezovszky, B., Lehtinen, E., & Hannula-Sormunen, M. M. (2023). Mathematical game performance as an indicator of deliberate practice. International Journal of Serious Games, 10(4), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v10i4.634.
-
Milovanović, I. (2020). Math anxiety, math achievement, and math motivation in high school students: Gender effects. Croatian Journal of Education, 22(1), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v22i1.3372.
-
Morocho Palacios, H. F., Cuenca Cumbicos, K. M., & Tapia Peralta, S. R. (2023). El impacto de la gamificación en la motivación y el aprendizaje de los estudiantes de matemáticas de educación básica superior. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 6494–6505. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6650.
-
Piñero Charlo, J. C., Noriega Bustelo, R., Canto López, M. del C., & Costado Dios, M. T. (2022). Influence of the algorithmization process on the mathematical competence: A case study of trainee teachers assessing ABN- and CBC-instructed schoolchildren by gamification. Mathematics, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10163021.
-
Ponticorvo, M., Schembri, M., & Miglino, O. (2022). Training and assessing numerical abilities across the lifespan with intelligent systems: The example of Baldo. Expert Systems, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12817.
-
Pradana, F., Setyosari, P., Ulfa, S., Hirashima, T., & Amalia, F. (2023). The effect of gamification-based programming e-learning platform on students' achievement. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626641.3626675.
-
Rocha, M., & Dondio, P. (2021). Effects of a videogame on math performance and anxiety in primary school. International Journal of Serious Games, 8(3), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.17083/IJSG.V8I3.434.
-
Rosillo, N., & Montes, N. (2021). An escape room dual-mode approach to teach maths during the COVID-19 era. Mathematics, 9(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202602.
-
Salah, O. H., & Alzaghal, Q. K. (2023). A conceptual model for implementing gamification in education and its impact on academic performance. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 488). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_48.
-
Setambah, M. A. B., Adnan, M., Zaini, S. H., Mujiasih, Hidayat, R., Ibrahim, M. A., & Hanazono, H. (2024). Impact of 'Donkey', 'Snap', and 'King' non-digital gamification cards on fourth-grade students' math performance in fractions. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p175-196.
-
-
Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where exactly to enhance critical and creative thinking: The use of problem posing or contextual learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877.
-
Trisnani, N., Retnawati, H., & Wuryandani, W. (2024). Challenges of Indonesian elementary school mathematics teachers in integrating critical thinking into the classroom. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp905-924.
-
Zabala-Vargas, S. A., García-Mora, L., Arciniegas-Hernández, E., Reina-Medrano, J., de Benito-Crosetti, B., & Darder-Mésquida, A. (2022). Didactic strategy mediated by games in the teaching of mathematics in first-year engineering students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11707.
-
Zanabazar, A., Deleg, A., Ravdan, M., & Tsogt-Erdene, E. (2023). The relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematical performance among undergraduate students. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i1.780.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.