Published: 2024-10-01
Understanding Digital Literacy Using Film: Case Study of Netflix’s The Social Dilemma
DOI: 10.35870/jtik.v8i4.2390
Downloads
Abstract
Social media may have been glorified as something helpful, easy and convenient but as we all know it must have two sides of a coin. Social media does have quite a lot of bad sides. Unfortunately, the majority of mass media only share the good and glorify it, without telling the dark side of it that is even more complex than it explained. This study uses a qualitative approach with Stuart Hall’s reception analysis theory to understand the audience's role in generating meaning of digital literacy. The literature review highlights the previous research on the spread of misinformation and the solutions proposed by tech giants and experts, which aligns with the current research on digital literacy for social media. Through this research participants show that they understand digital literacy better after watching “The Social Dilemma” documentary film. Digital literacy is a very important skill that people must understand. This film proves that digital literacy can be taught and understood by watching this film
Keywords
Glorification of Social Media ; Dark Side of Social Media ; Digital Literacy
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024)
-
Section: Computer & Communication Science
-
Published: %750 %e, %2024
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2024 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/jtik.v8i4.2390
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
Aliva Pudyas Permata Putri
Broadcasting and Digital Media Communication Study Program, Faculty of Communication, LSPR Communication & Business Institute, Central Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
Hersinta
Broadcasting and Digital Media Communication Study Program, Faculty of Communication, LSPR Communication & Business Institute, Central Jakarta City, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia
-
Davis, J. S., & Davis, J. S. (2016). Why Social Media?. Building a Professional Teaching Identity on Social Media: A Digital Constellation of Selves, 1-4.
-
Yonatan, A. Z. (2023). Menilik Pengguna Media Sosial Indonesia 2017-2026. Data. Goodstats. Id, 1-3.
-
Di Giovanni, E. (2020). Reception studies and audiovisual translation. The Palgrave Handbook of audiovisual translation and media accessibility, 397-413.
-
Diniasti, T. H., & Haqqu, R. (2022, December). Receiving Messages of Technological Determinism in the Documentary Film “The Social Dilemma”: Analysis of Receptions in Teenagers. In 7th International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICoSaPS 2022) (pp. 74-85). Atlantis Press.
-
Kuhn, A., & Westwell, G. (2012). A dictionary of film studies. Oxford University Press, USA.
-
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (Vol. 30). Peter Lang.
-
Nasrullah, R., Aditya, W., Satya, T. I., Nento, M. N., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, M., & Akbari, Q. S. (2017). Materi pendukung literasi digital.
-
Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2014). Introduction: The language of social media. In The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet (pp. 1-20). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
-
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent education, 5(1), 1519143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143.
-
Monggilo, Z. M. Z. (2020). Analisis konten kualitatif hoaks dan literasi digital dalam@ komikfunday. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 1-18.
-
Kurnia, N., Nurhajati, L., & Astuti, S. I. (2020). Kolaborasi Lawan (Hoaks) Covid-19: Kampanye, Riset dan Pengalaman Japelidi di Tengah Pandemi. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi UGM.
-
Haqqu, R. (2020). Era baru televisi dalam pandangan konvergensi media. Rekam: Jurnal Fotografi Televisi, 16(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.24821/rekam.v16i1.3721
-
Suherdi, D. (2021). Peran literasi digital di masa pandemik. Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna.
-
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of research in nursing, 23(1), 42-55.
-
Miller, D., Sinanan, J., Wang, X., McDonald, T., Haynes, N., Costa, E., ... & Nicolescu, R. (2016). How the world changed social media (p. 286). UCL press.
-
Johnson, M. J. (2021). Books and social media: How the digital age is shaping the printed word. Routledge.
-
Iddianto, I., & Azi, R. (2022). SOCIAL EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA REVEALED IN THE SOCIAL DILEMMA DOCUMENTARY MOVIE: POST-TRUTH PERSPECTIVE. Seshiski: Southeast Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(1), 37-50. DOI https://doi.org/10.53922/seshiski.v2i1.3.
-
Fajrin, S., Siregar, Y. D., & Monang, S. (2022). Audience's Perception of the Impact of Social Media on Film “The Social Dilemma”. International Journal of Cultural and Social Science, 3(1), 106-112.
-
Augustine, R., & Xavier, M. S. (2021). A Critical Study On Netflix Docudrama ‘The Social Dilemma’. Media, Culture and Society, 22, 24.
-
Shuili, D. (2022). Reimagining the Future of Technology:“The Social Dilemma” Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(1), 213-215. DOI:10.1007/s10551-021-04816-1.
-
Law, N. W. Y., Woo, D. J., De la Torre, J., & Wong, K. W. G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4. 2.
-
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30(2008), 17-32.
-
Hall, S. (2007). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In CCCS selected working papers (pp. 402-414). Routledge.
-
Moleong, L. J., & Edisi, P. R. R. B. (2004). Metodelogi penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit Remaja Rosdakarya, 3(01).
-
Basnet, H. B. (2018). Focus group discussion: a tool for qualitative inquiry. Researcher: A Research Journal of Culture and Society, 3(3), 81-88.
-
Abidi, S. H., Madhani, S., Pasha, A., & Ali, S. (2017). Use of cinematic films as a teaching/learning tool for adult education. Canadian journal for the study of adult education, 29(1), 37-48.
-
McQuail, D. (2020). McQuail's media and mass communication theory.
-
Vo, K., Yamazaki, K., Nguyen, P. X., Nguyen, P., Luu, K., & Le, N. (2022, October). Contextual explainable video representation: Human perception-based understanding. In 2022 56th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (pp. 1326-1333). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEEECONF56349.2022.10052051.
-
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
-
Harmoko, D. D. (2021). Digital Literacy As A Solution To Improve The Quality Of Indonesia's Human Resources. Research and Development Journal of Education, 7(2), 413-423.
-
Leaning, M. (2019). An approach to digital literacy through the integration of media and information literacy. Media and communication, 7(2), 4-13.
-
Valanarasu, M. R. (2021). Comparative analysis for personality prediction by digital footprints in social media. Journal of Information Technology, 3(02), 77-91.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.