Published: 2024-07-06
Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Berwirausaha di Kalangan Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus: Institut Teknologi Del)
DOI: 10.35870/ljit.v2i2b.2839
Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the factors influencing entrepreneurial interest among students at Del Institute of Technology. The research focuses on three main factors: entrepreneurial motivation, student creativity, and entrepreneurship learning models. Using a quantitative approach with a survey method, this study involved 36 respondents from 2nd, 3rd, and 4th-year students selected through simple random sampling. The analysis results show that student creativity and entrepreneurial interest have very high index values, while entrepreneurial motivation demonstrates a high value, and the entrepreneurship learning model is at a moderate level. Validity tests prove all questions in the questionnaire are valid, while reliability tests indicate that the variables of entrepreneurial motivation, entrepreneurship learning model, and entrepreneurial interest are reliable. However, the student creativity variable did not show adequate reliability. These findings provide important insights for developing effective strategies in promoting entrepreneurship among students, although further research is needed to investigate the factor of student creativity more deeply.
Keywords
Entrepreneurial Interest ; Entrepreneurial Motivation ; Student Creativity ; Entrepreneurship Learning ; Model ; Del Institute of Technology
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the LANCAH: Jurnal Inovasi dan Tren. The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 2 No. 2b (2024)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: %750 %e, %2024
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2024 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ljit.v2i2b.2839
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
Romantri Pasaribu
Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Institut Teknologi Del, Toba, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Mariana Simanjuntak
Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Institut Teknologi Del, Toba, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
-
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
-
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity". Westview Press.
-
Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254.
-
Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 53-61.
-
Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: What do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 9-26.
-
Fayolle, A., & Liñán, F. (2014). The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024
-
Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Graf, J. M., & Kampschulte, A. (2012). Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 559-576.
-
Hahn, D., Minola, T., Van Gils, A., & Huybrechts, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial education and learning at universities: Exploring multilevel contingencies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 32(5-6), 471-502.
-
Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education: A study of Iranian students' entrepreneurial intentions and opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 187-209.
-
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
-
Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
-
Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933.
-
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
-
Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x
-
Shane, S., Locke, E. A., & Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00017-2
-
Santoso, Singgih. 2002. Statistik Dengan SPSS. Jakarta. Elex Media Computindo
-
Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention-behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386-399.
-
Umar. Husein. 2001. Metode Riset Bisnis. Jakarta. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
-
Zampetakis, L. A., Gotsi, M., Andriopoulos, C., & Moustakis, V. (2011). Creativity and entrepreneurial intention in young people: Empirical insights from business school students. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12(3), 189-199.
-
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.