Pengaruh Fee Audit, Rotasi Audit, Audit Capacity Stress dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Earning Manipulation dengan Moderasi Kualitas Audit
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The survey was conducted on 40 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange during the observation period from 2016 to 2020. The sampling method used in this study was targeted sampling. The hypothesis of this study was tested using multiple regression analysis to measure the effect of the relationship between dependent and independent variables. The purpose of this study was to examine the variables Audit Fee (FA), Audit Rotation (RA), Audit Ability Stress (ACS), and revenue operation size representative of the Beneish M-score, with audit quality as a moderator variable, as experienced by manufacturing firms. to analyze it objectively. Listed on the stock exchange. effect. A sample of 40 and 200 Indonesian securities for the period 2016-2012. The results of this study show that the Beneish M-Score is highly influenced by exam fees, exam rotation, exam capacity load, and size. The FA variable has a 10% significant negative impact on profit manipulation (Beneish M-score). That is, the higher the audit fee accepted by management, the less evidence of manipulation of the financial statements. The RA variable has a very positive effect on profit manipulation. In other words, the more often audit rotations occur, the higher the likelihood of balance sheet manipulation. ACS variables have a significant negative impact on yield manipulation (beneish M-score) at = 10%. That is, the more audit clients, or the higher the ACS, the higher the monitoring that does not lead to manipulation of the financial statements. Finally, the size variable has a large positive impact on profit manipulation. H. The larger the company size, the more evidence of balance sheet manipulation. The results of the Model 2 study indicate that the presence of trial quality as a moderator variable can influence the relationship between FA, RA, ACS and size (Benish M score) in the profit manipulation. If the presence of audit quality (QA) weakens the impact of almost all variables on earnings manipulation (Benish m Score), this suggests that the presence of a reputable audit quality KAP enhances corporate scrutiny and reduces earnings manipulation and investor interest. It means avoiding useful information. and interested persons. Account holders and these factors are considered by investors and stakeholders to provide more relevant information.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Almilia, L. S., & Sifa, L. L. (2006). Reaksi pasar publikasi corporate governance perception index pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Jakarta. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) IX Padang.
Amasti, N., Surbakti, L. P., & Warman, E. (2020). Determinasi Rotasi KAP, Tenur Auditor Dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 8(3), 277-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v8i3.366.
Arens Alvin, A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing dan Jasa Assurance. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2001). Manajemen Keuangan. Buku 1 edisi 8. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Cesideria, E. I., & Sukarmanto, E. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit dan Audit Capacity Stress terhadap Manajemen Laba. Prosiding Akuntansi, 518-522. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v0i0.21322.
Dwi Prastowo. (2004). Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Edisi Kedua. Penerbit YKPN
El-Gammal, W. (2012). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from Lebanon. International Business Research, 5(11), 136.
Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegero, Semarang, 2016
Hadiprajitno, P. T. B. (2012). Struktur kepemilikan, mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan, dan biaya keagenan di Indonesia (studi empirik pada perusahaan di Bursa Efek Indonesia) (Doctoral dissertation, Program Pascasarjana Undip).
Hasanah, A. N., & Putri, M. S. (2018). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Tenure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi) Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 11-21.DOI: https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v5i1.499.
Indonesian Institute For Corporate Governance. (2009). Good Corporate Governance Dalam Perspektif Manajemen Strategik, Katalog Dalam Terbitan.
Indrayanti. (2016). Pengauditan,Aditya Media Publishing, Malang.
Jensen, M. C. (1976). Meckling. WH 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Juliana, T. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Manajerial, Leverage Dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Manajemen Laba, Dengan Kualitas Audit Sebagai Faktor Pemoderasi.
Kasmir. (2008). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kurniawansyah, D. (2017). Pengaruh audit tenure, ukuran auditor, spesialisasi audit dan audit capacity stress terhadap manajemen laba (Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listed di BEI tahun 2010-2015). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Airlangga, 1(1).
Manossoh, H. (2016). Good Corporate Governance untuk meningkatkan kualitas laporan keuangan. PT Khasrisma Indonesia, Jakarta, 2016
Nugraha, E., Nugroho, L., & Dwijayanty, R. (2018, September). Rotasi Audit Sebuah Kajian Fenomenologis. In Seminar Nasional dan Diskusi Panel Multidisiplin Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2018 (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Sartono, A. (2010). Manajemen Keuangan teori dan Aplikasi edisi 4. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Sri S. (2008). Manajemen Laba, Grasindo, Jakarta.
Sugiyono, D. (2008). Metode penelitian bisnis. Bandung: Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas.
Sukrisno A. (2013). Auditing. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
Tuanakotta, Theodorus. M. (2010). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Prenada Media.