Published: 2024-08-30
Comparison of SAW and TOPSIS Methods in Decision Support Systems for Contraceptive Selection
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v4i2.2815
Joko Susilo, Elyza Gustri Wahyuni
Article Metrics
- Views 0
- Downloads 0
- Scopus Citations
- Google Scholar
- Crossref Citations
- Semantic Scholar
- DataCite Metrics
-
If the link doesn't work, copy the DOI or article title for manual search (API Maintenance).
Abstract
Family Planning (FP) is a crucial initiative in enhancing the quality of life and health of mothers and children. However, selecting the appropriate contraceptive method remains a significant challenge for many couples of reproductive age. This study proposes the development of a web-based Decision Support System (DSS) that integrates the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) at Zahra Harapan Bunda Clinic. The system aims to provide accurate recommendations for selecting contraceptive methods, record data, monitor users, and remind acceptors of consultation schedules. The results indicate that the SAW method is more consistent and aligns more closely with expert recommendations compared to TOPSIS, with a higher conformity percentage ranging from 66.25% to 92.5%. In contrast, TOPSIS showed a lower conformity percentage, ranging from 25.89% to 78.03%. These findings suggest that SAW more accurately reflects expert recommendations and is therefore considered more effective for selecting contraceptive methods. The study recommends the use of the SAW method for decision-making in contraceptive method selection and suggests further research to expand and validate this approach in a broader range of applications.
Keywords
Family Planning (FP) ; Contraceptive Methods ; Decision Support System (DSS) ; Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) ; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) ; Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM)
Article Metadata
Peer Review Process
This article has undergone a double-blind peer review process to ensure quality and impartiality.
Indexing Information
Discover where this journal is indexed at our indexing page to understand its reach and credibility.
Open Science Badges
This journal supports transparency in research and encourages authors to meet criteria for Open Science Badges by sharing data, materials, or preregistered studies.
How to Cite
Article Information
This article has been peer-reviewed and published in the International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS). The content is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
-
Issue: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
-
Section: Articles
-
Published: %750 %e, %2024
-
License: CC BY 4.0
-
Copyright: © 2024 Authors
-
DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v4i2.2815
AI Research Hub
This article is indexed and available through various AI-powered research tools and citation platforms. Our AI Research Hub ensures that scholarly work is discoverable, accessible, and easily integrated into the global research ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence for indexing, recommendation, and citation analysis, we enhance the visibility and impact of published research.
-
-
Brata, A. H., Fanani, L., & Rosalina, L. (2020). Evaluasi usability sistem informasi program KB berbasis Android menggunakan USE questionnaire. Cybernetics, 4(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.29406/cbn.v4i01.1599
-
Kungkung, A., & Kiswanto, R. H. (2018). Analisa perbandingan metode SAW, WP dan TOPSIS menggunakan Hamming Distance. KNSI 2018. Retrieved from http://jurnal.atmaluhur.ac.id
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal non-exclusive right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.