Pelatihan dan Pendampingan Implementasi Online Assessment bagi Guru SMK Pariwisata Kertayasa Singakerta Ubud
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35870/jpmn.v4i2.3432Keywords:
Training, Mentoring, Online assessmentAbstract
The latest assessment paradigm emphasizes that assessment is not only used for assessment but also for the learning process. It encourages teachers at SMK Pariwisata Kertayasa Singakerta Ubud to innovate in the assessment process, such as online assessments. The observation results showed that teachers needed training and mentoring on the online assessments. It underlies the implementation of the community service program carried out by the team of the English Language Education Study Program, FKIP Unmas Denpasar entitled “Training and Mentoring Online Assessment Implementation for SMK Pariwisata Kertayasa Singakerta Ubud Teachers.” After the observation, training and mentoring activities were then carried out on 2 and 15 July 2024. The training activities showed an increase in understanding of the participants regarding the implementation of online assessments, especially Quizizz, Kahoot and Formative. This can be seen from the pre-test and post-test results. The teachers also showed their enthusiasm and activeness. In the mentoring activity, the teachers were also able to implement online assessments well. They were able to use online assessments not only to create variations in assessments but also to make the assessment process more effective and efficient.
Downloads
References
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 3–31). AU Press, Athabasca University.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Bach, S., Haynes, P., & Lewis, J. (2007). Online learning and teaching in higher education. Open University Press.
Balula, A., & Moreira, A. (2014). Evaluation of online higher education: Learning, interaction and technology. Springer International Publishing.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Bencsik, A., Horvath-Csikos, G., & Juhasz, T. (2016). Y and Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2015). Skills for the 21st century: What should students learn? (Issue May). Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Budiarta, I. K. (2019). The achievement of genre paragraph writing ability of high school students assessed through intensive and responsive writing assessment. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan, 9(1).
Budiarta, I. K., & Krismayani, N. W. (2024). Post-pandemic shifts in English language teaching: Challenges and perceptions in online learning environments. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.25678
Budiarta, I. K., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). TPS-Flipgrid: Transforming EFL speaking class in the 21st century. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3801
Budiarta, I. K., Maharani, A. A. P., & Arsana, A. A. P. (2024). Pelatihan CLIL bagi guru SMK PGRI 3 Denpasar: Perencanaan, penerapan dan penilaian. Mejuajua: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(3), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.52622/mejuajuajabdimas.v3i3.114
Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach english with technology. Pearson Education Limited.
Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English (New Editio). Pearson Education Limited.
Heugh, K., French, M., Armitage, J., Taylor-Leech, K., Billinghurst, N., & Ollerhead, S. (2019). Using multilingual approaches: Moving from theory to practice. British Council.
Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning Journal, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moore, D. R. (2009). Designing online learning with Flash. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Motteram, G. (2013). Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. British Council.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Shank, P., & Sitze, A. (2004). Making sense of online learning: A guide for beginners and the truly skeptical. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tenbrink, T. D. (2011). Assessment. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (9th ed., pp. 296–340). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Weller, M. (2002). Delivering learning on the net: The why, what & how of online education. RoutledgeFalmer.
Yu, E. (2020). Student-inspired optimal design of online learning for generation Z. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1), 1–11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright Retention and Open Access License
- Authors retain full copyright of their work
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
- This license allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
2. Rights Granted Under CC BY 4.0
Under this license, readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use
- No additional restrictions — the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as license terms are followed
3. Attribution Requirements
All uses must include:
- Proper citation of the original work
- Link to the Creative Commons license
- Indication if changes were made to the original work
- No suggestion that the licensor endorses the user or their use
4. Additional Distribution Rights
Authors may:
- Deposit the published version in institutional repositories
- Share through academic social networks
- Include in books, monographs, or other publications
- Post on personal or institutional websites
Requirement: All additional distributions must maintain the CC BY 4.0 license and proper attribution.
5. Self-Archiving and Pre-Print Sharing
Authors are encouraged to:
- Share pre-prints and post-prints online
- Deposit in subject-specific repositories (e.g., arXiv, bioRxiv)
- Engage in scholarly communication throughout the publication process
6. Open Access Commitment
This journal provides immediate open access to all content, supporting the global exchange of knowledge without financial, legal, or technical barriers.
WhatsApp 
Telegram 
Email 
Ethical Guidelines 
FAQ 
Template English 
For Reader 
For Authors 
For Librarians 
