Pengaruh Belanja Ekonomi di Era Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Kemiskinan di Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v5i1.257
Keywords:
Poverty Economic Spending Decentralization Fiscal

Main Article Content

Zainuddin Zainuddin
Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Serambi Mekkah
Hamdani Hamdani
Fakultas Ekonomi, Politeknik Kutaraja
Ilyas Ilyas
Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Serambi Mekkah
Maryam Maryam
Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Serambi Mekkah

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of provincial government sectoral spending on poverty in the era of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the sectoral expenditure variables that are considered closely related to poverty are economic spending, housing and public facilities spending, health spending, education spending, and social protection spending according to provinces in Indonesia. The data in this study is panel data, namely cross-section of 33 provinces, and time series of 4 years, namely the period 2012 - 2015. After the Chow test and Hausman test, as well as the lagrange multiplier test, the analysis model in this study was determined to be the random effect model, which is a common analysis model in panel data analysis. This study concludes that partially negative economic spending on poverty, meaning that sector spending can reduce poverty in the era of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia. In this analysis, it was found that the ability of the independent variable in explaining the dependent variable was 0.190165 units or 19.02%, and the remaining 80.98% was explained by other variables not included in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zainuddin, Z., Hamdani, H., Ilyas, I., & Maryam, M. (2021). Pengaruh Belanja Ekonomi di Era Desentralisasi Fiskal terhadap Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal EMT KITA, 5(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v5i1.257
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): JANUARY-JUNE 2021
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An author  who publishes in  the  Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi agrees to the following terms:

  1. Author retains the  copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of  the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Author is  able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book)with the  acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Author is  permitted and encouraged to post his/her  work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons LicenseJurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Teknologi (EMT) KITA by http://journal.lembagakita.org/index.php/emt/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Ade, Cahyat., Christian, G., & Michaela, H. (2007). Mengkaji Kemiskinan dan Kesejahteraan Keluarga. Bogor: Cifor. Aksara.

Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., Klein, O., Claassen, A., & Wood, R. (2016). Poverty, inequality, and increased consumption of high calorie food: Experimental evidence for a causal link. Appetite, 100, 162-171.

Dercon, S., Gilligan, D. O., Hoddinott, J., & Woldehanna, T. (2009). The impact of agricultural extension and roads on poverty and consumption growth in fifteen Ethiopian villages. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(4), 1007-1021.

Greene, W. (2012). H.(2012): Econometric Analysis.

Indonesia, R. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. Jakarta (ID): RI.

Indonesia, R. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta (ID): RI.

Indonesia, R. (33). Tahun 2004 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Direktorat Jenderal Otonomi Daerah, Jakarta.

Jhingan, M. L. (2016). Ekonomi pembangunan dan perencanaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Jia, J., Guo, Q., & Zhang, J. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Economic Review, 28, 107-122.

Jin, J., & Zou, H. F. (2005). Fiscal decentralization, revenue and expenditure assignments, and growth in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(6), 1047-1064.

Johnson, N. L., Kovarik, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Njuki, J., & Quisumbing, A. (2016). Gender, assets, and agricultural development: Lessons from eight projects. World Development, 83, 295-311.

Kumari, R. (2016). Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Policy of Local Goverment. International Journal of Advanced Research, 1013-1014.

Mai, T., & Mahadevan, R. (2016). A research note on the poverty dynamics and cost of poverty inequality: Case study of Indonesia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 49, 100-107.

Martinez-Vazquez, J., & McNab, R. M. (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World development, 31(9), 1597-1616.

Neyapti, B. (2010). Fiscal decentralization and deficits: International evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), 155-166.

Noor, M. (2012). Memahami Desentralisasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Interpena.

O'Boyle, E. J. (1999). Toward an improved definition of poverty. Review of Social Economy, 57(3), 281-301.

Omari, L. V., & Muturi, W. (2016). The effect of government sectoral expenditure on poverty level in Kenya. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(8), 219-242.

Otsuka, K., & Kalirajan, K. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization and Development Outcomes in India: An Exploratory Analysis.

Reid, C. A., & Evanson, T. A. (2016). Using simulation to teach about poverty in nursing education: A review of available tools. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(2), 130-140.

Sánchez, C. S. G., Mavrogianni, A., & González, F. J. N. (2017). On the minimal thermal habitability conditions in low-income dwellings in Spain for a new definition of fuel poverty. Building and Environment, 114, 344-356.

Sinnathurai, V., & Březinová, O. (2012). Poverty Incidence and its determinants in the estate sector of Sri Lanka. Journal of Competitiveness.

Thornton, J. (2007). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered. Journal of urban economics, 61(1), 64-70.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2006). Pembangunan ekonomi.; Edisi Kesembilan; Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Van den Broeck, G., & Maertens, M. (2017). Moving up or moving out? Insights into rural development and poverty reduction in Senegal. World Development, 99, 95-109.

World Bank., 2006. Era Baru Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gradasi

Xie, D., Zou, H. F., & Davoodi, H. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. Journal of Urban economics, 45(2), 228-239.

Yang, Z. (2016). Tax reform, fiscal decentralization, and regional economic growth: New evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 59, 520-528.

Yushkov, A. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(4), 404-418.